Perhaps it's the fact it's a TV series, with weekly cliffhangers that make it addictive. Perhaps it's Sean Bean meeting ANOTHER untimely end. Perhaps it's all the nudity. But George R. R. Martin's series has been a worldwide success.
A column in the Evening Standard magazine on 13 April gave the headline news:
- The TV series is airing in 150 countries;
- 522 000 people in the UK watched the first episode of series two. Only 98 000 tuned in for the fifth season premier of Mad Men.
- Each TV series costs £38m to make.
I personally dislike the format of telling a story through individual characters having their own distinct storyline. Although I hugely admire the planning and forethought that goes into it, I get irritated by an author of such omniscience that they seem to be weaving you into some great tapestry, with only them knowing what the eventual design will be. I think that for some people this is the appeal - there is no chance of guessing the ending. Martin's characters are interesting too - not as delineated between good and evil as many fantasy novels, LOTR included.
Perhaps this is one of the reasons for the success of the series. Despite the obvious fantastical world, there is something 'real' about the scenarios. This may be something that appeals to those who usually dismiss fantasy as too simplistic. But as my post below says, one of the reasons I love the genre is exactly this simplicity.
Telling a story through alternating characters will never be a device I employ. Apart from anything else, I don't plan stories like that - I write chronologically and only know what's coming next after I've written the previous bit. I'm willing to admit that is potentially a limit on the scope of my writing. I will never devise an entire language for my worlds, as Martin has in creating Dothraki. And I will never write a series of eleventy-billion books. I just don't have the scale of ambition. But I will write the sort of books that I would like to read. And which author can do more than that?